So, that's all I have to say about that.
I haven't warned the hippies and commies in a while, but I am now! Warning: Follow only if ye be men of valour! For the entrance to this cave is guarded by a creature so foul, so cruel that no man yet has fought with it and lived! Bones of four fifty men lie strewn about its lair! So, brave knights, if you do doubt your courage or your strength, come nay further, for death awaits you all with
nasty big pointy teeth!
Heh heh heh... Tim.
Now, in the course of my first week of school, I discovered
this through
The Jawa Report. Needless to say, it made me angry. Very angry. Actually, more like f***ing pissed off. Now, I don't get very passionate about too many things. Sadly, people sometimes force me to make decisions for them (where to go to eat, etc...) under the guise that I'm too indecisive because I just don't care. Yeah, I know that's not fair to me, blah blah blah, but I don't care about that either. However, when I do care about something, it is often deeply rooted and for a good reason. Gun rights happens to be one of these things. I haven't written about them in a while because of time constraints and the fact that I haven't found anything lately (I failed to bookmark The High Road when I made the switch to Firefox.
I am a rather petite girl. Not even average height, and barely over 115lbs. Not only that, but I am not very confident. Granted, it has been improving at a slow but steady rate over the past few months, but I still need a lot of work. Now, knowing that, what would happen if someone were to attack me? Even if I were to fight back (even with my tang soo do training, which is getting very near black belt)--which is often said to deter them--what would be my chances? And what if it were a group of them? What if they had a knife or a gun? I'm sorry, but I don't particularly want to be scraped off the bottom of a river months after being raped and killed.
I know all the mantra about walking in groups (because, you know, I have oh so many friends here), avoiding shady places, carrying a
flashlight, not going out after dark, locking your doors, and appearing confident... all that stuff. I know it, I've heard it a thousand times. I take martial arts classes, and carry pepper spray (just got new
Mean Green--it's pretty nifty), a flashlight, and a folded pocket knife with the blade under 4ish inches in length (in compliance with the law), but I still don't feel as safe as I want to be. Martial arts is only useful sofar as I can move my arms and legs. If a group of people attack me, there's no way I can defend against all of them or keep them from, say, pinning my arms and legs. Pepper spray is pretty great (a) if you can get to it quickly, easily, and without fine motor skills (which would likely be lost when under attack), (b) if the attacker isn't immune to the chemical (Quoth Reno 911: Miami, "There's no immunity to bullets!"), and (c) if you can run fast enough to get away. Granted, those three would likely line up, especially if only one person is attacking, but I would really rather not take chances. The flashlinght, well... heh. And the pocket knife carried in a folded position, as the law requires, is completely useless. It might make a nice gift to the attacker, though.
Ideally, I would want the entire society to stop being such idiots so that I can open-carry a nice 1911 everywhere--especially on college campus. Obviously, however, that ain't gonna happen. So I would like to settle for my little Kahr, concealed. Oh, but I'm under 18--I'm still a child, and therefore cannot be trusted with my own safety in any way, shape, or form. But seriously, DUDE!
What is most likely the overall point of this post, is the fact that people who want to carry firearms are not just the criminals on the streets. The people who should be "allowed" to carry them are not just the police officers. Women, generally, are physically far weaker than men (yes, femininsts are wrong), and therefore need a way to protect themselves from men who would burglarize, beat, rape and/or murder them. They need a way to protect their children. Teachers need a way to protect themselves and their students from, say, a psychopath who manages the oh-so-difficult task of carrying--what was it? 2 9mm?--onto campus and slaughtering 31 human beings. Of course, men need to be able to carry as well. If a woman, like many of her gender, is uncomfortable with carrying a gun but would allow her husband to do so (I know of a few cases), he should be able to defend his family when he can. Obviously, men can also be burglarized, beaten, raped, and murdered as well as women. One would probably be less likely to choose them for a violent attack as opposed to a woman, but it does happen.
So, the original overall point relates back to the link at the beginning. It seems the Department of Justice (which seems to translate to "Bush Administration," so I'm guessing the two are directly connected. I'm not a political science major.) filed a brief with the SCOTUS, asking them to overturn the appeals court decision on the D.C. gun ban, stating something along the lines of this: while it is
blatantly obvious that the second amendment protects an individual's right to keep and bear arms, the government should still be able to impose "reasonable restrictions (Translate: bans)" on that right of the people that shall not be infringed. Feh.
Next time I have time to post: long guns!
I am not reading through all that, so my apologies for typos.
I wonder who my one reader is.